Here’s my latest post about AMD. Here’s an excerpt from a Frobes article: “Intel’s latest desktop processors have faster clocks speeds and use smaller transistors–45 nanometers as opposed to 65 nanometers–that allow them to do more work with less power, _all else being equal_. “We think that Intel is consolidating its performance lead in desktops,” (more…)
Developing the coastal regions for so long during the Mao period has left a huge disparity between the economies of the interior and the coast. The gap is so large that even though the interior in some areas is growing at the same rate as the coastal regions, the absolute gap only grows larger because of the disparity of their starting points.
While the six and seven five-year plans were based on the system that economic development would diffuse into the center from the coastal regions, this was not a good idea…
After having the opportunity to visit a rural farming community in China it made me realize many things about China’s impressive growth. It is not an efficient growth, but an inefficient one. We see skyscrapers and massive Olympic structures being constructed every month but this is only a small part of China. Outside the two great cities of Beijing and Shanghai some small communities with de-collectivized farms hardly have any paved roads, and some have none at all. While we see this huge growth in China now, I do not believe that this growth is sustainable. My main reasons are as follows:
1. No infrastructure between inner and coastal China exists. During my visit to a small village the people said…
China’s market is getting harder and harder to understand; if they are in a bubble and how long it will last, or if there will be a correction and when, is a major topic with the coming Olympics. So I thought I would move the topic to another area. While there have been huge amounts (more…)
This two-part series by Bryant Urstadt is some of the best investing writing I’ve ever read. Bryant gives a run down of exactly what-the-f happened this Summer 2007. After reading these two pieces, "it all makes sense, man". Part 1: The Blow Up Teaser: On Wednesday, August 8, not long after the markets closed, 200 (more…)
As we all saw on Wednesday, the Federal Reserve made equal 25 basis point cuts to the Federal Funds Rate and the Discount Rate. While we are happy that core inflation is not going to be a large problem with this rate cut, and that we are easing rates in a growing economy where we just saw the U.S. economy grow at an annualized growth rate of 3.9%, I believe that many other problems will arise.
While lowering rates will bring along a lower borrowing cost I do not think that our economy needs this. Doing this will only bring people to spend more money on things they do not need. As we saw already companies that sold necessities like The Procter & Gamble Company(NYSE:PG) and Johnson & Johnson(NYSE:JNJ) have both been doing well though the subprime market problems.
Lowering rates now will also…
With oil prices hitting $92 a barrel and could possibly go higher, corn and soy ethanol are sounding pretty cheap and are beginning to be a real alternative, not just something we talk about. E85 can even be found for under $2.00 a gallon in cities scattered across the United States, where gasoline sits almost (more…)
Question: are we in a bull market or bear market? What if there was a third option? In Active Value Investing, Vitaliy Katsenelson makes a case that the current market is actual a "range-bound market" and then gives you the tools to take full advantage of the fact.
What is a Range Bound Market?
Range-bound markets are characterized by their roller-coaster-like volatility and the fact that despite this volatility, money invested in the beginning of the cycle will have close to 0% gains by the end of the cycle. In fact, range-bound markets are more common than bear markets. Katsenelson says:
"…if you look at the U.S. stock market during the entire twentieth century, most of the prolonged (greater than five years) markets were actually bull or range-bound markets. Prolonged bear (declining) markets happened in the past only when high market valuation was coupled with significant economic deterioration, similar to what was going on in Japan from the late 1980s through 2003 or so."
This chart from the book shows the past 107 years bull, bear, and range-bound markets as labeled by Kevin A. Turtle.
Lots of hub bub in the poker community about some apparent cheating that has been going on at AbsolutePoker.com. Bobby has a nice comic about the cheating at PlusEV.net, and probably the best place to get info and updates is Absolute Poker Cheats blog that was setup just for the occasion.
Traders will appreciate this chart showing how much of an outlier one suspected cheater is. That red dot in the upper right corner represents the win-rate of the suspected cheater. The trading analogy would be a trader who trades 90% of the stocks on the market and correctly predicts the stocks movement 90% of the time. With stats like these, you could make an insane amount of money. And that’s exactly what these guys have done, reportedly making hundreds of thousands of dollars in a short time.
For the poker illiterate, VPIP stands for “variably put money into pot”, which is a statistic that tracks what percentage of hands you play. Good players are in the 15-30% range. The cheaters are in the 70-90%.
BB/100 stands for “big blinds per 100 hands”, which measures how profitable you are. So if you were playing $100/$200 poker with a 1BB win-rate, you would win on average $200 every 100 hands. Winning players can make about 1-3BB/100 at the medium and high limits. In the short term (across a small number of hands), lucky players can make about 100BB/100 hands. The cheater graphed makes 500BB/100.
The graph is pretty damning, but probably most damning of all (at least to a poker player with a bit of knowledge) is to go over some of the actual hand histories that leaked for this player. You can read some play-by-play analysis with some guesses as to the cheaters thinking here or see a video replay of the hands here (requires a free registration). The short of it is that the villain is playing uncannily like he/she can see the other players cards.
Is there cheating like this going on in the stock market?
Obviously, Martha Stewart-style insider trading goes on, but what I’m thinking about here is the kinds of cheating available to unethical brokers. Unlike the online poker rooms, many of the big brokers have their own traders “playing” in the same market as their clients. This creates the same kind of conflicts-of-interest that the poker sites try to avoid.
While you wait for the rest of my Google analysis (it may be a while), you can read this article over at Forbes that closely matches my own thinking. Google Still Cheap Atop Tech Heap by Georges Yared. Peace out, Investor Geeks.
