In my previous article, Misconception: Renting is for Suckers, I wrote that there comes a point when it makes more sense to rent an apartment than buy a home. For myself, I have a rule of thumb that for every $1 dollar I spend in rent a month I can afford to buy up to $125 in property. Right now I pay $1000 in rent, so using my rule I shouldn’t spend more than $125,000 on a home. This created a surprising amount of controversy; some exclaiming me a heretic, and some accusing me of house-hating. For those of you who wanted to know where that number came from, wait no longer — and I’ve put together a calculator for you to figure out how much you should spend on a home.

But wait… Isn’t buying always better?

For those who view buying a home as an investment, there comes a point when it makes more sense to rent than buy. There are many expenses involved in owning a home that need to be weighed against the cost of renting, such as property taxes, maintenance, repairs, and major expenses such as a new roof or appliances. If you pay too much for a house, your expenses will be greater than your current rent. In essence, your house would be costing you more money!

There are three major benefits of home ownership: equity, reduced taxes and appreciation. These benefits are great, but they run out at some point and don’t automatically make buying a better option. The question is when is buying the better option? What we need to do is figure out at what point the costs and benefits of home ownership become equal or less than renting.

So how much should I pay?

In my last article I wrote that my rule of thumb is for every dollar of rent I spend, I can buy up to $125 in property. That means with my $1,000/mn rent, I should buy a home that costs no more than $125,000. That’s unfortunate for me because it’s nearly impossible to find anything habitable for that price in Northern NJ where I live. Therefore for me renting is the better choice.

But the ratio is different for everyone because it is affected by a number of variables and from what I’ve seen the ratio typically ranges between 100:1 and 190:1. The factors that impact the ratio the most are:

  • How much you can spend as down payment. Larger down payment; higher ratio.
  • How many itemized deductions you have. More itemized deductions; higher ratio.
  • How much property taxes are in your area. Lower property taxes; higher ratio.
  • What the current interest rates are. Lower interest rates; higher ratio.

I’ve built a calculator in Excel for you to use that will tell you the most you should spend on a house. You simply open the file, enter in a few variables and use Goal Seek to figure out how much you should spend on a house. You can also look into help to buy a house.

You can also use a mortgage rate calculator to determine your total mortgage payment based on interest and loan amount.

Download the Maximum Home Price Calculator
Plus: Help with Goal Seek

Take a few minutes to download and play with the calculator. If you have questions please post a comment here or email me at chris {at} investorgeeks * com, and I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.

Why tax benefits are overhyped

In my previous article I wrote that tax deductions were flakey, and therefore I didn’t include them in my calculations. That was probably too hasty and I have now included them in my calculator. Tax deductions can result in real savings, but because of the Standard Deduction the benefit you receive from your mortgage and property taxes will vary based on how many other deductions you have in a given year.

When you look at the tax benefits of owning a home you have to look at the extra tax benefit you receive above and beyond the Standard Deduction because you can’t take it if you itemize your expenses. Think of the Standard Deduction as a hole. If you want to save a pile of money, you first have to fill the hole. The more deductions you have, the smaller the hole will be when you include your potential home deductions.

If you cannot itemize any other deductions other than mortgage interest, the standard deduction ($5,000 for single filers) will in essence be deducted from your mortgage interest. So if you’re single and you can deduct $6,000 in mortgage interest and $3,000 in property taxes, you’ll be able to itemize $9,000. But the tricky part is that it’s only going to reduce your taxable income by $4,000 because your standard deduction is now gone. The more deductions you can itemize, the more your taxes will be reduced when you buy a home.

To see just how much your current itemized deductions affect your price ratio take a look at the following table.

Downpayment Taxes Deductions Price Ratio
$ 20,000 2.5% $ 0 118:1
$ 20,000 2.5% $ 2,500 125:1
$ 20,000 2.5% $ 5,000 132:1

In this case, the difference between having no itemized deductions and expenses equal to the standard deduction meant a ratio increase of 12%. Even with a higher down payment and lower taxes, maximizing your deductible expenses could increase the price ratio by 5-10%.

My calculator has built-in support for tax benefits so it does the work for you. Simply enter in the standard deduction that applies to you and how many deductions you can itemize this year, and it will do the rest.

I still won’t bet the farm on appreciation

Many people criticized my last article that I didn’t take appreciation into account, but I’m okay with that. I’ve built appreciation into the calculator if you’d like to include it in your analysis, but I like to sleep well at night, so I want my house to be financially sound on a cash flow basis first so that bull markets are even sweeter. Using leverage may mean huge returns but it can also mean devastating losses. The market right now is in a very weird spot, and it could keep going up or it could fall precipitously. With all bets off on the direction of the market, I’ll err on the conservative side.

You should buy a home… Eventually!!

The reaction to my previous article uncovered something that I had already suspected: people have strongly-held beliefs about home buying. Let me assuage those people now. A home is a place to live, and if you feel strongly about buying a home because you’re looking to start a family or settle down for 10+ years, then I encourage you to buy a home.

However, for those of us who are still young and will likely not keep our next home for more than a few years, then I encourage you to look at buying a home as an investment. And just like any investment, there is an element of timing. The motto is not "buy high, sell low" and likewise we should not buy when home prices are overvalued.

Home buying should be for everyone, but that doesn’t mean it has to happen today. If the numbers work for you then make the leap cause you are leaving money on the table by renting. Otherwise, sit back and relax as your landlord mows your lawn for you and you wait for the right time to buy. The more you can stash away in the bank now, the bigger your down payment will eventually be and the more you can afford to pay for a home.

Wrapping it Up

Buying a home isn’t always the best option. There comes a point when home ownership will actually cost you more money than renting. Given my circumstances I can spend up to $125,000 on a home — unfortunately even condos in my market cost more than that and so for now renting is the best option for me. The amount is different for everyone based on how much they can afford for a down payment, what property taxes are like in their market, and others. Using the Maximum Home Price Calculator you can quickly and easily figure out how much you should be spending on a home and if renting is the best option for you.

Misconception: Renting is for Suckers. Chris Welch. InvestorGeeks.
Publication 530: Tax Information for First-Time Homeowners. IRS.
Your Home as a Tax Shelter. NOLO.
Is It Better to Buy or Rent? David Leonhardt. New York Times.

I find that most people, in NYC as that is where I am an agent, have no clue how much transaction costs are going to be, especially with condos. So, when they sit down and try to figure out how much house they can afford, they do so without counting closing fees.

For a $500K condo in NYC, you are looking at about $22,000 in transaction fees. That doesnt include moving fees, or board package processing fees either. So, with a 10% down payment, you are looking at roughly $75K just to do the deal!

Quick tip, every buyer should discuss closing fees with their attorney beforehand to get a better idea of how much house they can really afford. Your debt/income ratio should be under 33% and you should have at least 6 months worth of liquid assets AFTER CLOSING as a safety net!

While I pretty much agree with you on this, I’d suggest you set a level of appreciation equal to the average inflation rate. This implies a relatively flat housing market, whereas using a level of 0 actually indicates a declining market, since in that case housing prices are not keeping up with the continued devaluation of the dollar.

Something I strongly suggest is, if at all possible, get out of the big cities where real estate costs so much. There’s some good discussion of this alongside some early retirement advice here. (see “Can I make money on a job switch without getting a raise?”).

As with the last article, I don’t think enough mention is made of inflation. It affects rental units, not mortgages. Also, where I live in Chicago, a lot of neighborhoods have gotten ‘cool’, causing a rapid increase in rents, forcing people to move to lesser neighborhoods–unfortunate when you’re the renter.


Inflation is an important aspect of home buying. You’re of course right that monthly payments for a fixed interest mortgage do not increase over time, and rent will at least match inflation on an annual basis. That being said, this analysis doesn’t question if home buying is a good thing, it merely questions if home buying is a good option over the coming year.

There is no question here that buying an affordable home is the wisest option over the long run.

Thanks for keeping me honest!

Chris said: There is no question here that buying an affordable home is the wisest option over the long run.

And this, in my view, is the best piece of advice one can give.

Is the house affordable and in a period of appreciation? If you can answer yes to this, then you should buy.

Is the house affordable but in a period of depreciation? You need to think long and hard about investing in this situation.

Is the house not affordable but still in a period of appreciation? Well then, buy a house in a more affordable area of town or the country.

Is the house not affordable and in a period of depreciation? Don’t buy and think long and hard about any existing properties you might have – it might be a good time to sell.

Of course this isn’t just relevant advice with regards to buying a house. It’s relevant for any asset class you are thinking of ‘investing’ in.

If you want to get the exact tax benefits, you can go to my website at
It gives you the EXACT tax benefit for owning your home. Why is it exact? Because my calculator do your taxes twice, one with home deductions, and one without. Both calculations of which can be standard or itemized deductions (whichever one is better for your tax).
I’ve run thru many calculations myself. The tax benefits are way over-hyped, unless your income is more than $160K.

Regarding the points being made on inflation, the monthly payment for a home is not entirely fixed. As the assessment and/or replacement value of a home rise over time, so do the property tax and/or insurance payments.

I learned this in South Boston about 7 years ago. I bought a recently-remodeled SFH in 2000, and at that time was still paying property taxes on the home’s assessment prior to the remodeling. Within a year of purchase, my monthly payment popped due to City of Boston re-assessing based upon my purchase and the gently rising local market at that time. That was a rather extreme jump, but cities do re-assess properties from time to time. And insurance companies do revise replacement values.

I’m no finance expert, but for a while now I’ve been thinking along the same lines as this article, although I wouldn’t think as conservatively as to ignore appreciation. This is the first I’ve come across someone who isn’t caught up in the “renting is throwing you money away” mantra.

I am in the market for a house (even though I recognize it’s probably financially better for me to rent in my situation). I was looking at a house recently and the realtor kept bring up the amazing tax benefits of buying vs. renting. I ignored it at first, but finally I told him, “Well, I’ve done the math and that really assumes that I’m itemizing now, but I’m taking the standard deduction so the tax benefit isn’t as great for me.”. His response… “Uhh… I suggest you talk to a CPA if you want to work out the details for your situation.” No thanks, I can do the match for myself: itemized deduction – standard deduction = amount I’m saving in taxes. Not rocket science.

Also, I’ve talked to people who tell me about how they bought a house and sold it years later for a profit, but they’re not taking into consideration all of the interest/maintenance/property tax they paid over that time… maybe it wasn’t such a great profit.

Anyone who says rentingos for suckers is indeed the real sucker. I have bee a long time renter and would love to own my own house. However, the last 10 years has been a brutal time to consider doing so. Rent money may have been thrown away, but I’ve moved accross Canada a few times free as a bird as I enjoyed my younger years. Many friends tied themselves to houses. Of course most had to go with less house for more money than they wanted. All experienced expensive repairs that caused great stresses in their lives and of course – zero mobility. So yes they have equity and I dont. But I actually have more money than all of them as my costs have been much lower and my mobility allowed me to make suddens changes to expand my business – earning more cash.

Now I’m considering buying and prices are still insane. So I’m looking on the low end and once again people are calling me crazy and stingy. Of course these are the same people who are tied to a 35 year mortgage and I’m buying with cash.

The real estate craze was a carrot before the horse and thats all their is to it. Las Vegas is the perfect example. That city has fallen 5 years ago in prices in the last year alone. Proof that real estate does not always go up. a 350k house in Las Vegas 2006 is now under 200k. Imagine being the poor sucker tied to a 350k mortgage on a house he could probably rent for $1200 … well of course the bank would have stepped in by now since his collateral is worth less than the loan. Those poor saps are broke, renting anway as their house will have been taken away and their credit is shot. This I predict is going to happen all over North America. Hotspot like Vancouver that have seen 130k condos go to 450k … well thats one hard fall coming.

Comments are closed.

Paying too much for a home?…

Are you paying too much for a home? It’s possible. In this followup to his popular “Misconception: Renting is for Suckers”, Chris explores how to calculate the maximum amount you should spend on a new home, and demonstrates that at some point rentin…

Maximum Home Price Calculator…

Chris at InvestorGeeks defends his thesis that there is a time/situation when its better to rent than to buy your own house. He’s got a neat-o calculator for you to play around as well!…

Carnival of the Capitalists – CoTC – Rethink(IP) Redux…

Well, as Steve said earlier – we are at it again. Welcome the the June 5th edition of the Carnival of the Capitalists.  Lots of good things to read and plenty of information for everyone. My special thanks to Brian……

[…] Recently, the blogosophere has been on all cyclinders talking about buying vs. renting, and many calculator spreadsheets has popped up. But my vote has to go to Julie Ali who is guest-blogging at Jim’s Blueprint for Financial Propserity. Her writing is absolutely terrific in its depiction of the emotional issues of buying vs. renting. […] There is a rental cycle that is the diagrammatic opposite to the house buying cycle. When people are madly engaged in a love affair with the purchasing of their first, second or final upscale home, they turn their nose down at even the mere plebeian thought of dating a rental house. Even the sensible arrangement of renting for a few years in order to acquire a down payment for said house is refused. “Why should we make the landlord richer?” they sniff as they run to their local banking casino of choice and throw down their chips to lose a fortune on the turn of the mortgage interest wheel. […] […]

[…] Fortunately, in the blogosphere, the shouting down comes after you’ve finished your point and I’ve seen no-one make more coherent points on the rent vs. buy debate than Chris of InvestorGeeks. His first post on the subject Misconception: Renting is for Suckers, where he comprehensively debunk this myth, provoked such debate that he’s followed up with another great post working out how much someone should pay for a house. […]