<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retreat!</title>
	<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/</link>
	<description>Learning and sharing investment knowledge.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: free seven card stud game</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-268441</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-268441</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;free seven card stud game...&lt;/strong&gt;

bureaucracy rogues admonitions reexamined guarding:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>free seven card stud game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>bureaucracy rogues admonitions reexamined guarding:&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: los casinos one line en panama</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-247457</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-247457</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;los casinos one line en panama...&lt;/strong&gt;

desperation periphery coffees:deposit.Amiga turned ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>los casinos one line en panama&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>desperation periphery coffees:deposit.Amiga turned &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: odds of straight flush</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-185594</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-185594</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;odds of straight flush...&lt;/strong&gt;

buttocks independent bellow plywood:gilding embarrassing ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>odds of straight flush&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>buttocks independent bellow plywood:gilding embarrassing &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-127299</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-127299</guid>
					<description>You are exactly right in what you say about SDS.  I try not to look at it technically, but work off the S&#38;P500 chart.  I have watched it for about a month - it doesn't always move 2x, sometimes it is more like 1.5x.

Also, I wouldn't want to hold this for longer than 2 months.  In the long run, this is going to flatline close to $0.  I am not sure what they will do then (reissue it at a new index price of $100 and let it fall all over again?  Or leave it so that we are buying in at 50c).

In either case, it does serve a good purpose in times like these. Overall, I'm not short the market, I'm very close to neutral, which is exactly where I want to be.  Whether I am right or wrong, I am out of the market for the next 2 or 3 months.  :)

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are exactly right in what you say about SDS.  I try not to look at it technically, but work off the S&amp;P500 chart.  I have watched it for about a month - it doesn&#8217;t always move 2x, sometimes it is more like 1.5x.</p>
<p>Also, I wouldn&#8217;t want to hold this for longer than 2 months.  In the long run, this is going to flatline close to $0.  I am not sure what they will do then (reissue it at a new index price of $100 and let it fall all over again?  Or leave it so that we are buying in at 50c).</p>
<p>In either case, it does serve a good purpose in times like these. Overall, I&#8217;m not short the market, I&#8217;m very close to neutral, which is exactly where I want to be.  Whether I am right or wrong, I am out of the market for the next 2 or 3 months.  <img src='http://www.investorgeeks.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Phil
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-127281</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-127281</guid>
					<description>I'm in at $54.

It's not where I wanted to get in, and the market may rise again tomorrow, but I think the break down below 1590 is a bad sign for the S&#38;P500 from here on in for the next few months.

The 6 month chart to me says "market top in".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in at $54.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not where I wanted to get in, and the market may rise again tomorrow, but I think the break down below 1590 is a bad sign for the S&amp;P500 from here on in for the next few months.</p>
<p>The 6 month chart to me says &#8220;market top in&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: If You Haven&#8217;t Figured It Out Yet, I&#8217;m a Confused Trader on InvestorGeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126498</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126498</guid>
					<description>[...] Maybe it&#8217;s all the green on the screen so far&#8230; but already after looking through things a bit more, I a am less bleak than I was earlier. I had commented on Philip John&#8217;s last post that after yesterday&#8217;s sell-off, I was ready to sell into today&#8217;s bounce to move to about 75% cash from 10% cash. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Maybe it&#8217;s all the green on the screen so far&#8230; but already after looking through things a bit more, I a am less bleak than I was earlier. I had commented on Philip John&#8217;s last post that after yesterday&#8217;s sell-off, I was ready to sell into today&#8217;s bounce to move to about 75% cash from 10% cash. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126433</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126433</guid>
					<description>One last follow up. Maybe I should post the SDS chart, but looking at it the 30DMA was broken through yesterday. Ideally, I would look for an open and close above it to confirm... then load as much money as possible into it. That's if this was a normal stock. 

The problem is I can't really make any fundamental or value decisions about a short of the S&#38;P (can I?). What's a good price for this fund? How do I know if it's over-values or under-valued. All I know is in general this fund is going to lose about 4-9% per year on average (or twice that if it's leveraged) because that's the historical gain of the S&#38;P.

So, needless to say, this fund should only be traded in the short-mid term. It's kind of like buying a stock of a company that you know is going to go out of business, but might have a shorterm bounce due to overselling. Strange stuff that doesn't fit into my quasi-investing quasi-trading technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last follow up. Maybe I should post the SDS chart, but looking at it the 30DMA was broken through yesterday. Ideally, I would look for an open and close above it to confirm&#8230; then load as much money as possible into it. That&#8217;s if this was a normal stock. </p>
<p>The problem is I can&#8217;t really make any fundamental or value decisions about a short of the S&amp;P (can I?). What&#8217;s a good price for this fund? How do I know if it&#8217;s over-values or under-valued. All I know is in general this fund is going to lose about 4-9% per year on average (or twice that if it&#8217;s leveraged) because that&#8217;s the historical gain of the S&amp;P.</p>
<p>So, needless to say, this fund should only be traded in the short-mid term. It&#8217;s kind of like buying a stock of a company that you know is going to go out of business, but might have a shorterm bounce due to overselling. Strange stuff that doesn&#8217;t fit into my quasi-investing quasi-trading technique.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126431</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126431</guid>
					<description>BTW, the SDS play is ballsy. (is it 2x leveraged too?) I don't know if I would short the market. 

I'm tempted to "lock-in" about a 20% gain for the year, but I'm not too big a fan of "locking-in". I mean, when are you going to put your money back in? January 1st. Are the trading opportunities going to be better then than now. Unless you are a hedge fund (who gets paid based on annual performance) or have some plans for your money, it doesn't make sense to lock in.

That said. If I looked at SDS as a normal stock. It looks like it's due for a buy. It's trading at about $52 now, and I could set a short-term target of $56. Nice gain. Maybe I should add index-based shorting to my repetoir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the SDS play is ballsy. (is it 2x leveraged too?) I don&#8217;t know if I would short the market. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to &#8220;lock-in&#8221; about a 20% gain for the year, but I&#8217;m not too big a fan of &#8220;locking-in&#8221;. I mean, when are you going to put your money back in? January 1st. Are the trading opportunities going to be better then than now. Unless you are a hedge fund (who gets paid based on annual performance) or have some plans for your money, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to lock in.</p>
<p>That said. If I looked at SDS as a normal stock. It looks like it&#8217;s due for a buy. It&#8217;s trading at about $52 now, and I could set a short-term target of $56. Nice gain. Maybe I should add index-based shorting to my repetoir.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126425</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/24/retreat/#comment-126425</guid>
					<description>I'm away on vacation now and was checking in on the market using my phone every once in a while. Everything looked pretty decent a little pullback... then when I checked after the market close: BLAM!

Just about all of my mutual funds and index funds are throwing sell signals for me. About half of my stock holdings are. I think I'm with you. I'm going to try to jump out of everything at a decent level today. If all goes well, I'll be about 75% cash (vs about 15% cash right now).

I hope we're not over-reacting. I don't think this is the end of days, but I do think we'll see more follow through with this pullback than some previous. Simply for the fact that we're up a bit higher, and some real technical levels have broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m away on vacation now and was checking in on the market using my phone every once in a while. Everything looked pretty decent a little pullback&#8230; then when I checked after the market close: BLAM!</p>
<p>Just about all of my mutual funds and index funds are throwing sell signals for me. About half of my stock holdings are. I think I&#8217;m with you. I&#8217;m going to try to jump out of everything at a decent level today. If all goes well, I&#8217;ll be about 75% cash (vs about 15% cash right now).</p>
<p>I hope we&#8217;re not over-reacting. I don&#8217;t think this is the end of days, but I do think we&#8217;ll see more follow through with this pullback than some previous. Simply for the fact that we&#8217;re up a bit higher, and some real technical levels have broken.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
