<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lure of Fundamentally Weighted ETFs</title>
	<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/10/the-lure-of-fundamentally-weighted-etfs/</link>
	<description>Learning and sharing investment knowledge.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ETF Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/10/the-lure-of-fundamentally-weighted-etfs/#comment-137025</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2007/07/10/the-lure-of-fundamentally-weighted-etfs/#comment-137025</guid>
					<description>I think that using the S&#38;P 500 to compare cap-weighted ETFs and fundamental-weighted ETFs doesn't show the full picture. The S&#38;P includes some mega-caps that certainly do significantly skew the holdings as you described. But as soon as you step in to a mid-cap ETF that tracks the S&#38;P 400 the skew isn't nearly as great -- the top 10 holdings represent only 7.5% of the fund.

I imagine this debate will rage on for many more years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that using the S&amp;P 500 to compare cap-weighted ETFs and fundamental-weighted ETFs doesn&#8217;t show the full picture. The S&amp;P includes some mega-caps that certainly do significantly skew the holdings as you described. But as soon as you step in to a mid-cap ETF that tracks the S&amp;P 400 the skew isn&#8217;t nearly as great &#8212; the top 10 holdings represent only 7.5% of the fund.</p>
<p>I imagine this debate will rage on for many more years!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
