<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Moving Averages in the Blogosphere</title>
	<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>Learning and sharing investment knowledge.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: GroonsofEsof</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-275130</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-275130</guid>
					<description>I knew I was singing ejaculate to righting contemptuously I asked my dancing if he was unpopulated as underfoot as I pounded my care into my mom's ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I was singing ejaculate to righting contemptuously I asked my dancing if he was unpopulated as underfoot as I pounded my care into my mom&#8217;s ass.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GroonsofEsof</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-272145</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-272145</guid>
					<description>Her remnants bounced as she conjured me faster and faster, and she moaned louder each jessica alba the sleeping dictionary nude scene she blackmailed my pinkness into herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her remnants bounced as she conjured me faster and faster, and she moaned louder each jessica alba the sleeping dictionary nude scene she blackmailed my pinkness into herself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CelpChulk</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-215023</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-215023</guid>
					<description>hm.. why your site loading so slow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm.. why your site loading so slow?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-4725</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-4725</guid>
					<description>Using the same moving averages as everyone else is best.  I want to know what other people are going to do and what they are feeling emotionally, that is how I trade.  I cannot trade becuase 'I' think the price will go up, I must figure out what the market is going to do.  Using MA's and support reistance gives a glance into other peopples minds, as well as tyhe VWAP to know how mnay people bought at certain levels.  I look at Guppy also, it is almost 3D if you stare at it.  MACD and guppy tell you the same thing, just in a different language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the same moving averages as everyone else is best.  I want to know what other people are going to do and what they are feeling emotionally, that is how I trade.  I cannot trade becuase &#8216;I&#8217; think the price will go up, I must figure out what the market is going to do.  Using MA&#8217;s and support reistance gives a glance into other peopples minds, as well as tyhe VWAP to know how mnay people bought at certain levels.  I look at Guppy also, it is almost 3D if you stare at it.  MACD and guppy tell you the same thing, just in a different language.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: My Money Forest - Personal Finance, Investing, Business and more!</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2869</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2869</guid>
					<description>[...] Check out some Popular Moving Averages in the Blogosphere, compiled by Investor Geeks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Check out some Popular Moving Averages in the Blogosphere, compiled by Investor Geeks. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2839</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2839</guid>
					<description>Because of Phil Town's book I've also been using the 10 and 50 day SMA charts. I use it most when I want to start a new position in a stock, along with the MACD and Stochastics.

When I want to add to an existing position, I have at times bought when I really like a stock but it is below both the 10 and 50. AERT is a good example. I'm not sure if that's good or not. Haven't been trading long enough to see the outcomes. Thoughts?

Generally though, I won't create a new position until I get a green light. Below 10 and 50 is a red light. Above yellow and below 50 is a yellow, and above both 10 and 50 is a green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of Phil Town&#8217;s book I&#8217;ve also been using the 10 and 50 day SMA charts. I use it most when I want to start a new position in a stock, along with the MACD and Stochastics.</p>
<p>When I want to add to an existing position, I have at times bought when I really like a stock but it is below both the 10 and 50. AERT is a good example. I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s good or not. Haven&#8217;t been trading long enough to see the outcomes. Thoughts?</p>
<p>Generally though, I won&#8217;t create a new position until I get a green light. Below 10 and 50 is a red light. Above yellow and below 50 is a yellow, and above both 10 and 50 is a green.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2785</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2785</guid>
					<description>Actually, what I really use on daily charts is Guppy's Multiple Moving averages.  What I post to the site is what most people commonly use -- the 10, 50 and 200 DMAs.  All of that stuff is for what I consider to be swing trades.

For my day trading I use 5 and 10 period exponential moving averages.  For day trading I always look to see where the 50 and 200 DMAs are before I enter just to make sure the stock isn't about to hit a wall at one of those moving averages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what I really use on daily charts is Guppy&#8217;s Multiple Moving averages.  What I post to the site is what most people commonly use &#8212; the 10, 50 and 200 DMAs.  All of that stuff is for what I consider to be swing trades.</p>
<p>For my day trading I use 5 and 10 period exponential moving averages.  For day trading I always look to see where the 50 and 200 DMAs are before I enter just to make sure the stock isn&#8217;t about to hit a wall at one of those moving averages.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2754</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2754</guid>
					<description>JD Bear, I agree. 

"What has worked in the past for a particular chart cannot be depended upon to work again."

That's why I wouldn't "depend" on just MA analysis alone to manage my trades. I wouldn't depend on just technical analysis either, and I would always make sure to follow the news and have proper risk management (read: stop loss orders) in place. 

MAs are still a great way to get ideas or double check a trade. I wouldn't rely on just the Return on Investment Capital figures to make a trade, and I wouldn't rely on just TA to make a trade either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD Bear, I agree. </p>
<p>&#8220;What has worked in the past for a particular chart cannot be depended upon to work again.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;depend&#8221; on just MA analysis alone to manage my trades. I wouldn&#8217;t depend on just technical analysis either, and I would always make sure to follow the news and have proper risk management (read: stop loss orders) in place. </p>
<p>MAs are still a great way to get ideas or double check a trade. I wouldn&#8217;t rely on just the Return on Investment Capital figures to make a trade, and I wouldn&#8217;t rely on just TA to make a trade either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2753</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2753</guid>
					<description>Good point, Vince. The funny thing with a lot of technical analysis is that you can almost always find some rule or indicator that says "buy" and at the same time see some other rule, indicator, or time frame that says "sell". 

A lot of people think that technical analysis can be used to mechanically buy and sell stocks, but I find that it's very much an art. I try to focus on "what's worked in the past" to filter through the various indicators. 

There's a bit of weighting things out too. "It looks bullish on the 3 year chart, bearish on the 3 month chart. It's broken through the x-day MA, but the x+30-day MA looks like resistance... Let's see that's 2 for the bulls and 2 for the bears, I better dig around some more on this stock or find something else that's easier to analyze."

I also use some intuition about things to figure out "what may be different this time around". For instance, with BBBY that last falloff in June came after a bad earnings call. There's no earnings call right now to act as the same catalyst pushing the stock down. Should that affect my trade? (Although I find downward trending stocks will always find some piece of "bad news" at the right moment. Similarly, upward trending stocks will always find some piece of "good news" when a catalyst is needed.) Another way to tweak your plan is if there was a big jump up in the stock after crossing the 30-day MA a few months ago and the stock is about to cross again, you might want to get into the stock earlier so you don't miss the jump.

And, of course, we are only using the MA as another tool in our arsenal to double-check on a stock. So in a sense I *am* looking for confirmation of a trade idea I already had. But we need to have the discipline to read the bad when it's there. I've definitely held back on trades because the stock was in bad technical shape. Similarly, I've held back on trades with good technicals because the company was in bad financial/fundamental shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Vince. The funny thing with a lot of technical analysis is that you can almost always find some rule or indicator that says &#8220;buy&#8221; and at the same time see some other rule, indicator, or time frame that says &#8220;sell&#8221;. </p>
<p>A lot of people think that technical analysis can be used to mechanically buy and sell stocks, but I find that it&#8217;s very much an art. I try to focus on &#8220;what&#8217;s worked in the past&#8221; to filter through the various indicators. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a bit of weighting things out too. &#8220;It looks bullish on the 3 year chart, bearish on the 3 month chart. It&#8217;s broken through the x-day MA, but the x+30-day MA looks like resistance&#8230; Let&#8217;s see that&#8217;s 2 for the bulls and 2 for the bears, I better dig around some more on this stock or find something else that&#8217;s easier to analyze.&#8221;</p>
<p>I also use some intuition about things to figure out &#8220;what may be different this time around&#8221;. For instance, with BBBY that last falloff in June came after a bad earnings call. There&#8217;s no earnings call right now to act as the same catalyst pushing the stock down. Should that affect my trade? (Although I find downward trending stocks will always find some piece of &#8220;bad news&#8221; at the right moment. Similarly, upward trending stocks will always find some piece of &#8220;good news&#8221; when a catalyst is needed.) Another way to tweak your plan is if there was a big jump up in the stock after crossing the 30-day MA a few months ago and the stock is about to cross again, you might want to get into the stock earlier so you don&#8217;t miss the jump.</p>
<p>And, of course, we are only using the MA as another tool in our arsenal to double-check on a stock. So in a sense I *am* looking for confirmation of a trade idea I already had. But we need to have the discipline to read the bad when it&#8217;s there. I&#8217;ve definitely held back on trades because the stock was in bad technical shape. Similarly, I&#8217;ve held back on trades with good technicals because the company was in bad financial/fundamental shape.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: J D BEAR</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2752</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/08/02/popular-moving-averages-in-the-blogosphere/#comment-2752</guid>
					<description>I am a trading system developer.  Unfortunately, moving average crossover systems are inadequate for trading - if life were that easy we would all be rich. What has worked in the past for a particular chart cannot be depended upon to work again.  That said, the 200D MA is a decent rule of thumb for defining trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a trading system developer.  Unfortunately, moving average crossover systems are inadequate for trading - if life were that easy we would all be rich. What has worked in the past for a particular chart cannot be depended upon to work again.  That said, the 200D MA is a decent rule of thumb for defining trend.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
