<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding The &#8216;Boring&#8217; In Attractive Stocks</title>
	<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/</link>
	<description>Learning and sharing investment knowledge.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2434</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2434</guid>
					<description>Wow, that's more than I imagined! I'm flattered...

But I also mean what I said about Venture Capitalist getting active again! Check out this story with some PriceWaterhouse Coopers data.

http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/07/21/the_venture_capitalists_web_20_list.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s more than I imagined! I&#8217;m flattered&#8230;</p>
<p>But I also mean what I said about Venture Capitalist getting active again! Check out this story with some PriceWaterhouse Coopers data.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/07/21/the_venture_capitalists_web_20_list.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/07/21/the_venture_capitalists_web_20_list.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2325</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2325</guid>
					<description>This article was featured on The Street's Daily Blog Watch on July 21st.
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/investing/10298356.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was featured on The Street&#8217;s Daily Blog Watch on July 21st.<br />
<a href='http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/investing/10298356.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/investing/10298356.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: W. P. Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2293</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2293</guid>
					<description>I'm a retired Fed Ex senior manager. You are right on. I was with
Fed Ex 15 years. Nothing flashy or outrageous about the firm or
it's management. Hard work, attention to detail, unrelenting on 
service improvements, and rigorous cost control.

I had 1,000 shares at one time. Following the advice of not
having too much in your company's stock. I sold 500 @ $57.
a few years ago. In retrospect a dumb move.

I would recomend UPS or FedEx to anyone not into transport
stocks. Watching either as a barometer for other sectors
in a portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a retired Fed Ex senior manager. You are right on. I was with<br />
Fed Ex 15 years. Nothing flashy or outrageous about the firm or<br />
it&#8217;s management. Hard work, attention to detail, unrelenting on<br />
service improvements, and rigorous cost control.</p>
<p>I had 1,000 shares at one time. Following the advice of not<br />
having too much in your company&#8217;s stock. I sold 500 @ $57.<br />
a few years ago. In retrospect a dumb move.</p>
<p>I would recomend UPS or FedEx to anyone not into transport<br />
stocks. Watching either as a barometer for other sectors<br />
in a portfolio.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2157</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2157</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Carnival of Investing...&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to this week's edition of the Carnival of Investing. I'm sticking with my usual method of hosting a carnival -- listing a summary of each piece with the author's reason for submitting the post to the carnival (for those...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Carnival of Investing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to this week&#8217;s edition of the Carnival of Investing. I&#8217;m sticking with my usual method of hosting a carnival &#8212; listing a summary of each piece with the author&#8217;s reason for submitting the post to the carnival (for those&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2096</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/07/13/finding-the-boring-in-attractive-stocks/#comment-2096</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Finding The Boring In Attractive Stocks...&lt;/strong&gt;

This author reminds us that there are often better investment opportunities in the companies that support hip glamorous companies than in the stocks of those glamorous companies....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Finding The Boring In Attractive Stocks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This author reminds us that there are often better investment opportunities in the companies that support hip glamorous companies than in the stocks of those glamorous companies&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
