<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Mother Mutual Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/</link>
	<description>Learning and sharing investment knowledge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intro to 401k Part 2 Update on InvestorGeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Intro to 401k Part 2 Update on InvestorGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorgeeks.com/?p=32#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] The Choosing a Fund section of Part 2 of our introduction to 401(k)s is now ready. Enjoy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Choosing a Fund section of Part 2 of our introduction to 401(k)s is now ready. Enjoy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intro to 401k Part 2 on InvestorGeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Intro to 401k Part 2 on InvestorGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorgeeks.com/?p=32#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] Be wary of jumping on the band wagon of &#8220;hot funds&#8221;. Often, if a fund has a good year, a bunch of new money will roll in. There is no reason to think that the fund will be as good at running 50 billion dollars as it was at running 5 billion. In a past article, Chris discussed the challenges big funds face. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Be wary of jumping on the band wagon of &#8220;hot funds&#8221;. Often, if a fund has a good year, a bunch of new money will roll in. There is no reason to think that the fund will be as good at running 50 billion dollars as it was at running 5 billion. In a past article, Chris discussed the challenges big funds face. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small-caps to the Rescue on InvestorGeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Small-caps to the Rescue on InvestorGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorgeeks.com/?p=32#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] Last Thursday, Chris wrote about Big Mother Mutual Funds and pointed out some reasons why you might not want to buy the &#8220;biggest and best&#8221; when it comes to mutual funds. Another problem with large mutual funds is that they lose their flexibility to invest in small-cap stocks. These funds are making investments in the tens of millions, which could add up to a sizable percentage of a small-cap&#8217;s total shares. It&#8217;s hard for a larger investor to make (or pull out of) an investment worth 5% or more of a company. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last Thursday, Chris wrote about Big Mother Mutual Funds and pointed out some reasons why you might not want to buy the &#8220;biggest and best&#8221; when it comes to mutual funds. Another problem with large mutual funds is that they lose their flexibility to invest in small-cap stocks. These funds are making investments in the tens of millions, which could add up to a sizable percentage of a small-cap&#8217;s total shares. It&#8217;s hard for a larger investor to make (or pull out of) an investment worth 5% or more of a company. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2005/12/09/big-mother-mutual-funds/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorgeeks.com/?p=32#comment-20</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also bad to invest in large popular mutual funds during a secular bear market. ;) But things really ARE different this time.  The &lt;a href=&#039;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;singularity &lt;/a&gt;is near!

Nice post, Chris.  Useful information to think about when, say, choosing a mutual fund for your 401k.  No matter the direction of the market, smaller mutual funds will always be more flexible (and thus make more money) than larger ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also bad to invest in large popular mutual funds during a secular bear market. <img src='http://www.investorgeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  But things really ARE different this time.  The <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity' rel="nofollow">singularity </a>is near!</p>
<p>Nice post, Chris.  Useful information to think about when, say, choosing a mutual fund for your 401k.  No matter the direction of the market, smaller mutual funds will always be more flexible (and thus make more money) than larger ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

